1. Home
  2. Issues
  3. Volume 29, Issue 2 (2018)
  4. Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and ...

Informatica


Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
Volume 29, Issue 2 (2018), pp. 265–280
Pub. online: 1 January 2018      Type: Research Article      Open accessOpen Access
Received
1 December 2017
Accepted
1 April 2018
Published
1 January 2018

Abstract

In the discrete form of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems, we are usually confronted with a decision-matrix formed from the information of some alternatives on some criteria. In this study, a new method is proposed for simultaneous evaluation of criteria and alternatives (SECA) in an MCDM problem. For making this type of evaluation, a multi-objective non-linear programming model is formulated. The model is based on maximization of the overall performance of alternatives with consideration of the variation information of decision-matrix within and between criteria. The standard deviation is used to measure the within-criterion, and the correlation is utilized to consider the between-criterion variation information. By solving the multi-objective model, we can determine the overall performance scores of alternatives and the objective weights of criteria simultaneously. To validate the proposed method, a numerical example is used, and three analyses are made. Firstly, we analyse the objective weights determined by the method, secondly, the stability of the performance scores and ranking results are examined, and finally, the ranking results of the proposed method are compared with those of some existing MCDM methods. The results of the analyses show that the proposed method is efficient to deal with MCDM problems.

References

 
Abdullah, L., Adawiyah, C.R. (2014). Simple additive weighting methods of multi criteria decision making and applications: a decade review. International Journal of Information Processing and Management, 5(1), 39–49.
 
Adalı, E.A., Işık, A.T. (2017). CRITIC and MAUT methods for the contract manufacturer selection problem. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 93–101.
 
Bauðys, R., Juodagalvienë, B. (2017). Garage location selection for residential house by WASPAS-SVNS method. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(3), 421–429.
 
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S.K., Yazdani, M., Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051–13069.
 
Cayir Ervural, B., Zaim, S., Demirel, O.F., Aydin, Z., Delen, D. (2018). An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey’s energy planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1538–1550.
 
Chang, S.-C., Tsai, P.-H. (2016). A hybrid financial performance evaluations model for wealth management banks following the global financial crisis. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(1), 21–46.
 
Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C.-L. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
 
Chen, W., Shen, Y., Wang, Y. (2018). Evaluation of economic transformation and upgrading of resource-based cities in Shaanxi province based on an improved TOPSIS method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 232–240.
 
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763–770.
 
Goodridge, W.S. (2016). Sensitivity analysis using simple additive weighting method. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 8(5), 27–33.
 
Gul, M., Celik, E., Aydin, N., Taskin Gumus, A., Guneri, A.F. (2016). A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Applied Soft Computing, 46, 60–89.
 
Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.P. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications: A State-of-the Art Survey. Springer, London.
 
Juodagalvienë, B., Turskis, Z., Ðaparauskas, J., Endriukaitytë, A. (2017). Integrated multi-criteria evaluation of house’s plan shape based on the EDAS and SWARA methods. Engineering Structures and Technologies, 9(3), 117–125.
 
Kalibatas, D., Kovaitis, V. (2017). Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(5), 650–660.
 
Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., Maksimovic, M. (2017). An approach to personnel selection in the tourism industry based on the SWARA and the WASPAS methods. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 51(1), 75–88.
 
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. (2018). The LINGO code and instructions for SECA, figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5830623.
 
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435–451.
 
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Amiri, M., Antucheviciene, J. (2016a). A new method of assessment based on fuzzy ranking and aggregated weights (AFRAW) for MCDM problems under type-2 fuzzy environment. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(1), 39–68.
 
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Amiri, M., Turskis, Z. (2016b). Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an application to supplier selection. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 11(3), 358–371.
 
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene (2017a). Assessment of third-party logistics providers using a CRITIC–WASPAS approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Transport, 32(1), 66–78. Transport.
 
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J. (2017b). Supplier evaluation and selection in fuzzy environments: a review of MADM approaches. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraþivanja, 30(1), 1073–1118.
 
Liu, L., Zhou, J., An, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, L. (2010). Using fuzzy theory and information entropy for water quality assessment in Three Gorges region. China. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 2517–2521.
 
MacCrimmon, K.R. (1968). Decision Making among Multiple-attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.
 
Mao, N., Song, M., Pan, D., Deng, S. (2018). Comparative studies on using RSM and TOPSIS methods to optimize residential air conditioning systems. Energy, 144, 98–109.
 
Mardani, A., Nilashi, M., Zakuan, N., Loganathan, N., Soheilirad, S., Saman, M.Z.M., Ibrahim, O. (2017). A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments. Applied Soft Computing, 57, 265–292.
 
Muddineni, V.P., Sandepudi, S.R., Bonala, A.K. (2017). Improved weighting factor selection for predictive torque control of induction motor drive based on a simple additive weighting method. Electric Power Components and Systems, 45(13), 1450–1462.
 
Mulliner, E., Malys, N., Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59(Part B), 146–156.
 
Nakhaei, J., Lale Arefi, S., Bitarafan, M., Kildienë, S. (2016). Evaluation of light supply in the public underground safe spaces by using of COPRAS-SWARA methods. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(2), 198–206.
 
Nie, R.-X., Wang, J.-Q., Zhang, H.-Y. (2017). Solving solar-wind power station location problem using an extended weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) technique with interval neutrosophic sets. Symmetry, 9(7), 106.
 
Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade (in Serbian).
 
Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.
 
Peng, X., Dai, J. (2017). Hesitant fuzzy soft decision making methods based on WASPAS, MABAC and COPRAS with combined weights. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33(2), 1313–1325.
 
Polat, G., Eray, E., Bingol, B.N. (2017). An integrated fuzzy MCGDM approach for supplier selection problem. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(7), 926–942.
 
Rathi, K., Balamohan, S. (2017). A mathematical model for subjective evaluation of alternatives in fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making using COPRAS method. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(5), 1290–1299.
 
Ren, J., Toniolo, S. (2018). Life cycle sustainability decision-support framework for ranking of hydrogen production pathways under uncertainties: an interval multi-criteria decision making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 222–236.
 
Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.
 
Rostamzadeh, R., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., Nobar, H.B.K. (2018). Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS- CRITIC approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 651–669.
 
Sakthivel, G., Sivakumar, R., Saravanan, N., Ikua, B.W. (2017). A decision support system to evaluate the optimum fuel blend in an IC engine to enhance the energy efficiency and energy management. Energy, 140, 566–583.
 
Sennaroglu, B., Varlik Celebi, G. (2018). A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 160–173.
 
Serrai, W., Abdelli, A., Mokdad, L., Hammal, Y. (2017). Towards an efficient and a more accurate web service selection using MCDM methods. Journal of Computational Science, 22, 253–267.
 
Shen, F., Ma, X., Li, Z., Xu, Z., Cai, D. (2018). An extended intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on a new distance measure with an application to credit risk evaluation. Information Sciences, 428, 105–119.
 
Soner, O., Celik, E., Akyuz, E. (2017). Application of AHP and VIKOR methods under interval type 2 fuzzy environment in maritime transportation. Ocean Engineering, 129, 107–116.
 
Stefano, N.M., Filho, N.C., Vergara, L.G.L., Rocha G. D, R.U. (2015). COPRAS (complex proportional assessment): state of the art research and its applications. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 13(12), 3899–3906.
 
Stević, Þ., Pamuèar, D., Vasiljević, M., Stojić, G., Korica, S. (2017). Novel integrated multi-criteria model for supplier selection: case study construction company. Symmetry, 9(11), 279.
 
Turanoglu Bekar, E., Cakmakci, M., Kahraman, C. (2016). Fuzzy COPRAS method for performance measurement in total productive maintenance: a comparative analysis. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(5), 663–684.
 
Walczak, D., Rutkowska, A. (2017). Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 706–714.
 
Walters, S.J. (2009). Quality of Life Outcomes in Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation: A Practical Guide to Analysis and Interpretation. Wiley, New York.
 
Wang, Y.-J. (2015). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 412–420.
 
Wang, L.-E., Liu, H.-C., Quan, M.-Y. (2016a). Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 175–185.
 
Wang, P., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y. (2016b). A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design. Information Sciences, 345, 27–45.
 
Wang, L., Zhang, H.-Y., Wang, J.-Q., Li, L. (2018). Picture fuzzy normalized projection-based VIKOR method for the risk evaluation of construction project. Applied Soft Computing, 64, 216–226.
 
Yalçı, n.N., Ünlü, U. (2017). A multi-criteria performance analysis of Initial Public Offering (IPO) firms using CRITIC and VIKOR methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 534–560.
 
Zardari, N.H., Ahmed, K., Shirazi, S.M., Yusop, Z.B. (2014). Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management. Springer International Publishing.
 
Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Sarka, V. (1994). The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1(3), 131–139.
 
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, 122(6), 3–6.
 
Zhang, H., Gu, C.-L., Gu, L.-W., Zhang, Y. (2011). The evaluation of tourism destination competitiveness by TOPSIS & information entropy – a case in the Yangtze River Delta of China. Tourism Management, 32(2), 443–451.

Biographies

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee Mehdi
m.keshavarz_gh@yahoo.com

M. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee received the BS degree in electrical engineering from University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran in 2010, the MS degree in production management in 2013 and PhD degree in management-operations research in 2017 from Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. He has published some papers in leading international journals such as Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Journal of Cleaner Production and Applied Mathematical Modelling. His research interests include multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, genetic algorithm, fuzzy MCDM, inventory control, supply chain management, scheduling and reliability engineering.

Amiri Maghsoud
amiri@atu.ac.ir

M. Amiri is a professor at the Department of Industrial Management, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. He received his PhD degree in Industrial Engineering from Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. He has published many papers in leading international journals. His research interests include multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), data envelopment analysis (DEA), design of experiments (DOE), response surface methodology (RSM), fuzzy MCDM, inventory control, supply chain management, simulation and reliability engineering.

Zavadskas Edmundas Kazimieras
edmundas.zavadskas@vgtu.lt

E.K. Zavadskas, PhD, DSc, h.c. multi. professor at the Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, chief research fellow at the Laboratory of Operational Research, Research Institute of Sustainable Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania. PhD in building structures (1973). Dr Sc. (1987) in Building Technology and Management. A member of Lithuanian and several foreign Academies of Sciences. Doctore Honoris Causa from Poznan, Saint Petersburg and Kiev universities. The honorary international chair professor in the National Taipei University of Technology. A member of international organizations; a member of steering and programme committees at many international conferences; a member of the editorial boards of several research journals; the author and co-author of more than 400 papers and a number of monographs in Lithuanian, English, German and Russian. Editor-in-chief of journals Technological and Economic Development of Economy and Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. Research interests: building technology and management, decision-making theory, automation in design and decision support systems.

Turskis Zenonas
zenonas.turskis@vgtu.lt

Z. Turskis is prof. dr. of technical sciences, professor at the Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chief Research Fellow at the Laboratory of Operational Research, Research Institute of Sustainable Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania. Research interests: building technology and management, decision-making theory, computer-aided automation in design, expert systems. He is the author of more than 120 research papers, which are referred in the Web of Science database.

Antucheviciene Jurgita
jurgita.antucheviciene@vgtu.lt

J. Antucheviciene is a professor at the Department of Construction Management and Real Estate at Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania. She received her PhD in civil engineering in 2005. Her research interests include multi-criteria analysis, decision-making theories and decision support systems, sustainable development, construction management and investment. She has co-authored more than 70 research papers, which are referred in the Web of Science database.


Full article Related articles Cited by PDF XML
Full article Related articles Cited by PDF XML

Copyright
© 2018 Vilnius University
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) criteria weight performance evaluation simultaneous evaluation of criteria and alternatives (SECA)

Metrics
since January 2020
8748

Article info
views

1442

Full article
views

1300

PDF
downloads

477

XML
downloads


Share


RSS