Informatica

Knowledge graphs are commonly represented by ontology-based databases. Tracking the provenance of ontological changes and ensuring ontology consistency is important. In this work, we propose a transaction manager for ontology-based database manipulation that combines blockchain and Semantic Web technologies. The latter is used for the efficient querying and modification of data, whereas the blockchain is used for the secure storage and tracking of changes. The blockchain enables a decentralized setup and data restoration. We evaluate our solution by measuring cost and time. Our solution introduces some overhead for updates whereas querying works at the same speed as the underlying ontology database.

This paper deals with the problem of selecting a suitable design pattern when necessary. The number of design patterns has been rapidly rising, but management and searching facilities appear to be lagging behind. In this paper we will present a platform, which is used to search for suitable design patterns and for design patterns knowledge exchange. We are introducing a novel design pattern proposing approach: the developer no longer searches for an appropriate design pattern, but rather the intelligent component asks the developer questions. We do not want to invest extra effort in terms of maintaining a special expert system. Guided dialogues consist of independent questions from different sources and authors that are automatically combined. The enabling algorithm and formulas are discussed in detail. This paper also presents our comparison with human-created expert systems via a decision tree. Experiments were executed in order to verify our approach performance. The control group used a human-created expert system, while others were given a proposing component to find appropriate design patterns.

Due to numerous public information sources and services, many methods to combine heterogeneous data were proposed recently. However, general end-to-end solutions are still rare, especially systems taking into account different context dimensions. Therefore, the techniques often prove insufficient or are limited to a certain domain. In this paper we briefly review and rigorously evaluate a general framework for data matching and merging. The framework employs collective entity resolution and redundancy elimination using three dimensions of context types. In order to achieve domain independent results, data is enriched with semantics and trust. However, the main contribution of the paper is evaluation on five public domain-incompatible datasets. Furthermore, we introduce additional attribute, relationship, semantic and trust metrics, which allow complete framework management. Besides overall results improvement within the framework, metrics could be of independent interest.