A Goal Programming Model for BWM

Amiri, Maghsoud; Emamat, Mir Seyed Mohammad Mohsen

doi:10.15388/20-INFOR389

Informatica

A Goal Programming Model for BWM

Volume 31, Issue 1 (2020), pp. 21–34

Maghsoud Amiri Mir Seyed Mohammad Mohsen Emamat

https://doi.org/10.15388/20-INFOR389

Pub. online: 23 March 2020 Type: Research Article

Open Access

Received
1 January 2019

Accepted
1 September 2019

Published
23 March 2020

Abstract

The best-worst method (BWM) is a multi-criteria decision-making method which works based on a pairwise comparison system. Using such a systematic pairwise comparison enhances consistency and reliability of results. The BWM results in single solution when there are two or three criteria, and for problems with fully-consistent systems, with any number of criteria. To obtain the weights of criteria for not fully-consistent comparison systems with more than three criteria, there may be a multiple optimal solution. Although multiple optimality may be desirable in some cases, in other cases, decision-makers prefer to have a unique optimal solution. This study proposes new models which result in a unique solution. The proposed models have less constraints in comparison with the previous models.

References

Aboutorab, H., Saberi, M., Asadabadi, M.R., Hussain, O., Chang, E. (2018). ZBWM: the Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development. Expert Systems with Applications, 107, 115–125.

Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., Arzaghi, S., Stauskis, G., Zavadskas, E. (2018). A hybrid fuzzy BWM-COPRAS method for analyzing key factors of sustainable architecture. Sustainability, 10(5), 16–26.

Bozóki, S., Csató, L., Temesi, J. (2016). An application of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices for ranking top tennis players. European Journal of Operational Research, 248, 211–218.

Brunelli, M., Fedrizzi, M. (2015). Boundary properties of the inconsistency of pairwise comparisons in group decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 765–773.

Condorcet, M.D. (1785). Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions. Imprimerie Royale, Paris.

Fechner, G. (1860). Elements of Psychophysics. Holt, Rinehart & Wilson, New York. Translation H. Adler.

Forman, E., Selly, M.A. (2000). Decision by Objectives. George Washington University. Expert Choice Inc.

Fülp, J., Koczkodaj, W.W., Szarek, S.J. (2010). A different perspective on a scale for pairwise comparisons. In: Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence I. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 71–84.

Guo, S., Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23–31.

Gupta, P., Anand, S., Gupta, H. (2017). Developing a roadmap to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 244–259.

Hafezalkotob, A., Hafezalkotob, A. (2017). A novel approach for combination of individual and group decisions based on fuzzy best-worst method. Applied Soft Computing, 59, 316–325.

Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, New York.

Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. (2012). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications a State-of-the-Art Survey, (Vol. 186). Springer Science & Business Media.

Ishizaka, A., Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345.

Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step–wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243–258.

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435–451.

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. (2018). Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for multi-criteria decision-making. Informatica, 29(2), 265–280.

Kim, Y., Kim, W., Shim, K. (2017). Latent ranking analysis using pairwise comparisons in crowdsourcing platforms. Information Systems, 65, 7–21.

Kocak, H., Caglar, A., Oztas, G.Z. (2018). Euclidean best–worst method and its application. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 17(5), 1587–1605.

Koczkodaj, W.W. (1993). A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 18(7), 79–84.

Koczkodaj, W.W., Szybowski, J., Wajch, E. (2016). Inconsistency indicator maps on groups for pairwise comparisons. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 69, 81–90.

Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis—a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41–52.

Liu, A., Xiao, Y., Ji, X., Wang, K., Tsai, S.B., Lu, H., Cheng, J., Lai, X., Wang, J. (2018a). A novel two-stage integrated model for supplier selection of green fresh product. Sustainability, 10(7), 2371.

Liu, S., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y. (2018b). Supply chain partner selection under cloud computing environment: an improved approach based on BWM and VIKOR. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

Lo, H.W., Liou, J.J. (2018). A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment. Applied Soft Computing, 73, 684–696.

Mohtashami, A. (2014). A novel meta-heuristic based method for deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgments. Applied Soft Computing, 23, 530–545.

Mou, Q., Xu, Z., Liao, H. (2016). An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making. Information Sciences, 374, 224–239.

Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.

Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., Ćirović, G. (2018). Modification of the best–worst and mabac methods: a novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 89–106.

Ren, J., Liang, H., Chan, F.T. (2017). Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 29–39.

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.

Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126–130.

Rezaei, J., Wang, J., Tavasszy, L. (2015). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using best worst method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9152–9164.

Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., Tavasszy, L. (2016). A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577–588.

Rezaei, J., Kothadiya, O., Tavasszy, L., Kroesen, M. (2018). Quality assessment of airline baggage handling systems using SERVQUAL and BWM. Tourism Management, 66, 85–93.

Roy, B. (1990). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp. 155–183.

Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Saaty, T.L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 841–855.

Salimi, N., Rezaei, J. (2016). Measuring efficiency of university-industry Ph.D. projects using best worst method. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1911–1938.

Salimi, N., Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 147–155.

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., Ćirović, G., Prentkovskis, O. (2017). The selection of wagons for the internal transport of a logistics company: a novel approach based on rough BWM and rough SAW methods. Symmetry, 9(11), 264.

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Subotić, M., Antuchevičiene, J., Zavadskas, E. (2018). The location selection for roundabout construction using Rough BWM-Rough WASPAS approach based on a new Rough Hamy aggregator. Sustainability, 10(8), 2817.

Thurstone, L.L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273–286.

Tian, Z.P., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, J.Q., Wang, T.L. (2018). Green supplier selection using improved TOPSIS and best-worst method under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Informatica, 29(4), 773–800.

Vinogradova, I., Podvezko, V., Zavadskas, E. (2018). The recalculation of the weights of criteria in MCDM methods using the bayes approach. Symmetry, 10(6), 205.

Yadav, G., Mangla, S.K., Luthra, S., Jakhar, S. (2018). Hybrid BWM-ELECTRE-based decision framework for effective offshore outsourcing adoption: a case study. International Journal of Production Research, 56(18), 6259–6278.

You, X., Chen, T., Yang, Q. (2016). Approach to multi-criteria group decision-making problems based on the best-worst-method and electre method. Symmetry, 8(9), 95.

Zavadskas, E.K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(2), 267–283.

Zavadskas, E.K., Stević, Ž., Tanackov, I., Prentkovskis, O. (2018). A novel multicriteria approach–rough step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis method (R-SWARA) and its application in logistics. Studies in Informatics and Control, 27(1), 97–106.

Zolfani, S.H., Chatterjee, P. (2019). Comparative evaluation of sustainable design based on Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Best Worst Method (BWM) methods: a perspective on household furnishing materials. Symmetry, 11(1), 74.

Zolfani, S.H., Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E.K. (2018). An extended stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method for improving criteria prioritization process. Soft Computing, 22(22), 7399–7405.

Biographies

Amiri Maghsoud

amiri@atu.ac.ir

M. Amiri is a professor at the Department of Industrial Management, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. He received his PhD degree in Industrial Engineering from Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. He has published many papers in leading international journals. His research interests include multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), data envelopment analysis (DEA), design of experiments (DOE), response surface methodology (RSM), fuzzy MCDM, inventory control, supply chain management, simulation and reliability engineering.

Emamat Mir Seyed Mohammad Mohsen

emamat@atu.ac.ir

M.S.M.M. Emamat received his MS degree in operations research from the University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, in 2016. He is currently a PhD candidate in operations research at Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. His research interests include multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), fuzzy MCDM and data mining.

Full article Related articles Cited by

Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords

multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) best-worst method (BWM) pairwise comparison (PC)

Metrics

since January 2020

2693 Article info views	1136 Full article views
1348 PDF downloads	391 XML downloads

RSS

Authors

Abstract

References

Biographies

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation

Download citation in file