Informatica

This paper focuses on the aggregation or scoring methods to evaluate the alternatives in Multiple Attribute Decision Making problems (MADM), e.g. Weighted Sum Model (WSM) and Weighted Product Model (WPM). The paper deals with the incorporation of the two concepts into the scoring methods, which has not been studied yet. These concepts are decision maker’s Indifference Thresholds (IT) and Yearning Thresholds (YT) on the decision making criteria. Reviewing the related literature reveals that the existent scoring methods do not have a suitable structure to involve the IT, and there is no scoring method which addresses a way to take the YT into account. The paper shows that there is an important drawback to the famous Aspiration Level (AL) concept. Hence, the YT idea is given to resolve the AL limitation. Based on the IT and YT concepts, two new scoring methods are developed: Extended WPM (EWPM) and Extended WSM (EWSM). The EWPM and EWSM are compared with the other scoring methods using a set of simulation analysis. A real-world case extracted from Exploration and Production (E&P) companies in oil industry is examined.

In this paper, firstly, we propose two new GTHFNs-prioritized aggregation operators called generalized trapezoidal hesitant fuzzy number prioritized weighted average operator and generalized trapezoidal hesitant fuzzy number prioritized weighted geometric operator. Secondly, we investigate the fundamental properties of the operators in detail such as idempotency, boundedness and monotonicity. Thirdly, we propose a method based on the developed GTHF-numbers prioritized aggregation operators for solving an MADM problem with GTHF-numbers. Fourthly, we give a numerical example of the developed method. Finally, a comparative analysis is given with some existing methods in solving an MADM problem with GTHF-numbers.

A p-rung orthopair fuzzy set (p-ROFS) describes a generalization of intuitionistic fuzzy set and Pythagorean fuzzy set in the case where we face a larger representation space of acceptable membership grades, and moreover, it gives a decision maker more flexibility in expressing his/her real preferences. Under the p-rung orthopair fuzzy environment, we are going to propose a novel and parametrized score function of p-ROFSs by incorporating the idea of weighted average of the degree of membership and non-membership functions. In view of this fact, this study is further undertaken to investigate and present different properties of the proposed score function for p-ROFSs. Moreover, we indicate that this ranking technique reduces some of the drawbacks of the existing ones. Eventually, we develop an approach based on the above-mentioned ranking technique to deal with multiple criteria decision making problems with p-rung orthopair fuzzy information.

In this paper, with respect to how to express the complex fuzzy information, we proposed the concept of interval-valued linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVLIFNs), whose membership and non-membership are represented by interval-valued linguistic terms, then the Hamming distance is defined, further, we also proposed the interval-valued linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. Considering that the VIKOR method can achieve the maximum “group utility” and minimum of “individual regret”, we extended the VIKOR method to process the interval-valued linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy information (IVLIFI), and proposed an extended VIKOR method for the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems with IVLIFI. And an illustrative example shows the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This paper proposes the concept of an interval neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy set (INHFS) and the operational relations of INHFSs. Then, we develop correlation coefficients of INHFSs and investigate the relation between the similarity measures and the correlation coefficients. Furthermore, a multiple attribute decision making method based on the correlation coefficients is established under interval neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy environment. Through the correlation coefficients between each alternative and the ideal alternative, we obtain the ranking order of all alternatives and the best one. Finally, an illustrative example of investment alternatives is given to demonstrate the application and effectiveness of the developed approach.