Informatica

This paper studies the generic construction of certificate-based signature (CBS) from certificateless signature (CLS). This paper proposes a new generic conversion from CLS to CBS which is more intuitive, simpler, and provably secure without random oracles than the current one. To develop the security proof, we put forth one novel CLS security model which features a previously neglected but nontrivial attack and hence captures the CLS security notion more comprehensively. We show that many existing CLS schemes can be proved secure in the current model by slightly modifying its original security proof. Following this conversion, many provably secure CBS schemes can be constructed from the corresponding existing CLS schemes.

A proxy signature scheme enables an original signer to delegate its signing capability to a proxy signer and then the proxy signer can sign a message on behalf of the original signer. Recently, in order to eliminate the use of certificates in certified public key cryptography and the key-escrow problem in identity-based cryptography, the notion of certificateless public key cryptography was introduced. In this paper, we first present a security model for certificateless proxy signature schemes, and then propose an efficient construction based on bilinear pairings. The security of the proposed scheme can be proved to be equivalent to the computational Diffie–Hellman problem in the random oracle with a tight reduction.

In 2008, based on the two-party Diffie–Hellman technique, Biswas proposed a contributory group key exchange protocol called the Group-DH protocol. This contributory property is an important one of group key agreement. Unfortunately, in this paper we show that the proposed Group-DH protocol is not a contributory group key exchange protocol. Therefore, we propose an improved group key exchange protocol with verifiably contributory property based on the same Diffie–Hellman technique. When an identical group key is constructed, each participant can confirm that his/her contribution is actually included in the group key. We show that the improved protocol is provably secure against passive attacks under the decisional Diffie–Hellman assumption. As compared to the previously proposed group key exchange protocols, our protocol provides contributiveness and the required computational cost is suitable for low-power participants in a network environment.

A generalized group-oriented cryptosystem (GGOC) based on ElGamal cryptosystem was proposed by Yang et al. in 2003. This study shows that if the authorized decryption sets of users are not properly predetermined in Yang et al.'s GGOC, an unauthorized decryption set of users can recover the encrypted message without difficulty. This study also presents an improved protocol to resist such an attack.

We revisit the password-based group key exchange protocol due to Lee et al. (2004), which carries a claimed proof of security in the Bresson et al. model under the intractability of the Decisional Diffie–Hellman problem (DDH) and Computational Diffie–Hellman (CDH) problem. We reveal a previously unpublished flaw in the protocol and its proof, whereby we demonstrate that the protocol violates the definition of security in the model. To provide a better insight into the protocol and proof failures, we present a fixed protocol. We hope our analysis will enable similar mistakes to be avoided in the future. We also revisit protocol 4 of Song and Kim (2000), and reveal a previously unpublished flaw in the protocol (i.e., a reflection attack).