Informatica logo


Login Register

  1. Home
  2. Issues
  3. Volume 32, Issue 3 (2021)
  4. A New Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Fr ...

Informatica

Information Submit your article For Referees Help ATTENTION!
  • Article info
  • Full article
  • Related articles
  • Cited by
  • More
    Article info Full article Related articles Cited by

A New Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Framework for Policy-Makers by Using Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy Numbers
Volume 32, Issue 3 (2021), pp. 583–618
Ayoub Mohammadian   Jalil Heidary Dahooie ORCID icon link to view author Jalil Heidary Dahooie details   Ali Reza Qorbani ORCID icon link to view author Ali Reza Qorbani details   Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas ORCID icon link to view author Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas details   Zenonas Turskis ORCID icon link to view author Zenonas Turskis details  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.15388/21-INFOR448
Pub. online: 15 July 2021      Type: Research Article      Open accessOpen Access

Received
1 October 2020
Accepted
1 March 2021
Published
15 July 2021

Abstract

Policy-makers are often hesitant to invest in unproven solutions because of a lack of the decision-making framework for managing innovations as a portfolio of investments that balances risk and return, especially in the field of developing new technologies. This study provides a new portfolio matrix for decision making of policy-makers to identify IoT applications in the agriculture sector for future investment based on two dimensions of sustainable development as a return and IoT challenge as a risk using a novel MADM approach. To this end, the identified applications of IoT in the agriculture sector fall into eight areas using the meta-synthesis method. The authors extracted a set of criteria from the literature. Later, the fuzzy Delphi method helped finalise it. The authors extended the SWARA method with interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers (IVTFN SWARA) and used it to the weighting of the characteristics. Then, the alternatives were rated using the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method based on interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers (IVTFN ARAS). Finally, decision-makers evaluated the results of ratings based on two dimensions of sustainability and IoT challenge by developing a framework for decision-making. Results of this paper show that policy-makers can manage IOT innovations in a disciplined way that balances risk and return by a portfolio approach, simultaneously the proposed framework can be used to determine and prioritise the areas of IoT application in the agriculture sector.

References

 
Akinyoade, A.J., Eluwole, O.T. (2019). The internet of things: Definition, tactile-oriented vision, challenges and future research directions. In: Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 797. Springer Verlag, Singapore, pp. 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_59.
 
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of things: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 17(4), 2347–2376. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095.
 
Aldowah, H., Ul Rehman, S., Umar, I. (2019). Security in internet of things: issues, challenges and solutions. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 843. Springer Verlag, pp. 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99007-1_38.
 
Aswale, P., Shukla, A., Bharati, P., Bharambe, S., Palve, S. (2019). An overview of internet of things: architecture, protocols and challenges. In: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 106. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, pp. 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1742-2_29.
 
Atanassov, K.T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3.
 
Atanassov, K., Gargov, G. (1989). Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31(3), 343–349.
 
Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of things: a survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010.
 
Bagočius, V., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2014). Multi-person selection of the best wind turbine based on the multi-criteria integrated additive-multiplicative utility function. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(4), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.932836.
 
Benkhelifa, E., Abdel-Maguid, M., Ewenike, S., Heatley, D. (2014). The Internet of things: the eco-system for sustainable growth. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA, Doha, Qatar. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2014.7073288.
 
Biggs, P., Garrity, J., LaSalle, C., Polomska, A. (2016). Harnessing the Internet of Things for Global Development. Switzerland.
 
Brewster, C., Roussaki, I., Kalatzis, N., Doolin, K., Ellis, K. (2017). IoT in agriculture: designing a Europe-Wide large-scale pilot. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600528.
 
Cardoso, T.F., Watanabe, M.D.B., Souza, A., Chagas, M.F., Cavalett, O., Morais, E.R., Nogueira, L.A.H.M., Leal, R.L.V., Braunbeck, O.A., Cortez, L.A.B., Bonomi, A. (2018). Economic, environmental, and social impacts of different sugarcane production systems. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 12(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1829.
 
Chiou, H.K., Tzeng, G.H., Cheng, D.C. (2005). Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy MCDM approach. Omega, 33(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.04.011.
 
Dahooie, J.H., Zavadskas, E.K., Abolhasani, M., Vanaki, A., Turskis, Z. (2018). A novel approach for evaluation of projects using an interval-valued fuzzy additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method: a case study of oil and gas well drilling projects. Symmetry, 10(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10020045.
 
Diwaker, C., Tomar, P., Sharma, A. (2019). Future aspects and challenges of the internet of things for the smart generation. In: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 500. Springer-Verlag, pp. 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0212-1_61.
 
Elijah, O., Rahman, T.A., Orikumhi, I., Leow, C.Y., Hindia, M.N. (2018). An overview of Internet of Things (IoT) and data analytics in agriculture: benefits and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(5), 3758–3773. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2844296.
 
Erdogan, S.A., Šaparauskas, J., Turskis, Z. (2017). Decision making in construction management: AHP and expert choice approach. Procedia Engineering, 172, 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.11.
 
Fatemi, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K. (2019). Multi-criteria evaluation in paradigmatic perspectives of agricultural environmental management. Heliyon, 5(2), e01229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01229.
 
Geng, H. (2017). Internet of things and data analytics handbook. Internet of Things and Data Analytics Handbook. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173601.
 
Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2013). Design of products with both International and Local perspectives based on Yin-Yang balance theory and SWARA method. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 26(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517613.
 
Herrera, F., Martínez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(6), 746–752. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.890332.
 
Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244.
 
Instituto de Normalización, Acreditación, (2018). Internet of things (IoT) technology, economic view and technical standardization. Luxembourg. Retrieved from. https://portail-qualite.public.lu/dam-assets/publications/normalisation/2018/white-paper-iot-july-2018.pdf.
 
Jolly, D. (2003). The issue of weightings in technology portfolio management. Technovation, 23(5), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00157-8.
 
Kamienski, C., Kleinschmidt, J., Soininen, J.-P., Kolehmainen, K., Roffia, L., Visoli, M., Maia, R.F., Fernandes, S. (2018). SWAMP: smart water management platform overview and security challenges. In: Proceedings – 48th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops, DSN-W 2018, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN-W.2018.00024.
 
Karabasevic, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Stanujkic, D. (2016). The framework for the selection of personnel based on the SWARA and ARAS methods under uncertainties. Informatica, 27(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2016.76.
 
Keršulienė, V., Turskis, Z. (2011). Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(4), 645–666. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.635718.
 
Keršulienė, V., Turskis, Z. (2014). A hybrid linguistic fuzzy multiple criteria group selection of a chief accounting officer. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2014.903201.
 
Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12.
 
Khan, S.F., Ismail, M.Y. (2017). An investigation into the challenges and opportunities associated with the application of Internet of Things (IoT) in the agricultural sector-A review. Journal of Computer Science, 14(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2018.132.143.
 
Khishtandar, S., Zandieh, M., Dorri, B. (2017). A multi criteria decision making framework for sustainability assessment of bioenergy production technologies with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: the case of Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 1130–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.212.
 
Kim, S., Kim, S. (2016). A multi-criteria approach toward discovering killer IoT application in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.007.
 
Kuo, Y.F., Chen, P.C. (2008). Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using fuzzy Delphi method. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 1930–1939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.068.
 
Lima Junior, F.R., Osiro, L., Carpinetti, L.C.R. (2014). A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 21, 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014.
 
Lin, C. (2013). Application of fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to criteria weights for fashion design scheme evaluation. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 25(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/09556221311300192.
 
Liu, Y., Eckert, C., Yannou-Le Bris, G., Petit, G. (2019). A fuzzy decision tool to evaluate the sustainable performance of suppliers in an agrifood value chain. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 127, 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.022.
 
Luthra, S., Garg, D., Mangla, S.K., Singh Berwal, Y.P. (2018). Analyzing challenges to Internet of Things (IoT) adoption and diffusion: an Indian context. Procedia Computer Science, 125, 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.094.
 
Marcis, J., Bortoluzzi, S.C., de Lima, E.P., da Costa, S.E.G. (2019). Sustainability performance evaluation of agricultural cooperatives’ operations: a systemic review of the literature. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21, 1111–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0095-1.
 
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Halicka, K., Ejdys, J., Magruk, A., Ungku, U.N. (2018). Determining the utility in management by using multi-criteria decision support tools: a review. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 31(1), 1666–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1488600.
 
Merad, M., Dechy, N., Serir, L., Grabisch, M., Marcel, F. (2013). Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an organization. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(3), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.019.
 
Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1497–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016.
 
Mohammadzadeh, A.K., Ghafoori, S., Mohammadian, A., Mohammadkazemi, R., Mahbanooei, B., Ghasemi, R. (2018). A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) approach for prioritizing internet of things challenges in Iran. Technology in Society, 53, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.007.
 
Mullen, P.M. (2003). Delphi: myths and reality. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 17(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260310469319.
 
Noje, D., Dzitac, I., Pop, N., Tarca, R. (2020). IoT devices signals processing based on shepard local approximation operators defined in riesz MV-algebras. Informatica, 31(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.15388/20-infor395.
 
Nukala, R., Panduru, K., Shields, A., Riordan, D., Doody, P., Walsh, J. (2016). Internet of Things: a review from “Farm to Fork.”. In: 2016 27th Irish Signals and Systems Conference, ISSC 2016. IEEE, PP. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSC.2016.7528456.
 
Peppard, J., Ward, J. (2012). The Strategic Management of Information Systems: Building a Digital Strategy. Retrieved from, security in information system.
 
Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., Georgakopoulos, D. (2014). Context aware computing for the internet of things: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(1), 414–454. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2013.042313.00197.
 
Pivoto, D., Waquil, P.D., Talamini, E., Finocchio, C.P.S., Dalla Corte, V.F., de Vargas Mores, G. (2018). Scientific development of smart farming technologies and their application in Brazil. Information Processing in Agriculture, 5(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2017.12.002.
 
Poursaeed, A., Mirdamadi, M., Malekmohammadi, I., Hosseini, J.F. (2010). The partnership models of agricultural sustainable development based on multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) in Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(2), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPP10.301.
 
Quaddus, M.A., Siddique, M.A.B. (2001). Modelling sustainable development planning: a multicriteria decision conferencing approach. Environment International, 27(2–3), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00066-6.
 
Ramakrishnan, M. (2008). IT portfolio management: a pragmatic approach to implement IT governance. In: Information Technology Governance and Service Management: Frameworks and Adaptations, pp. 297–312. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-008-0.ch017.
 
Ray, P.P. (2017). Internet of things for smart agriculture: technologies, practices and future direction. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 9(4), 395–420. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-170440.
 
Reza Ghaeli, M., Vavrik, J., Nasvadi, G. (2003). Multicriteria project portfolio selection: case study for intelligent transportation systems. In: Transportation Research Record, pp. 125–131. https://doi.org/10.3141/1848-18.
 
Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., Karami, E. (2008). A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10, 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9072-1.
 
Ruzgys, A., Volvačiovas, R., Ignatavičius, Č., Turskis, Z. (2014). Integrated evaluation of external wall insulation in residential buildings using SWARA-TODIM MCDM method. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.843585.
 
Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.
 
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
 
Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company, Inc., New York.
 
Scharfy, D., Boccali, N., Stucki, M. (2017). Clean technologies in agriculture-How to prioritise measures? Sustainability, 9(8), 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081303.
 
Shen, K.Y., Tzeng, G.H. (2018). Advances in multiple criteria decision making for sustainability: modeling and applications. Sustainability, 10(5), 1600. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051600.
 
Silvius, A.J.G. (2010). The business value of IT: a conceptual model for understanding and selecting valuation methods. In: Enterprise IT Governance, Business Value and Performance Measurement, pp. 102–111. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-346-3.ch007.
 
Stanujkic, D. (2015). Extension of the ARAS method for decision-making problems with interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers. Informatica, 26(2), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.51.
 
Stanujkic, D. (2016). An extension of the ratio system approach of MOORA method for group decision-making based on interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1070771.
 
Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Brauers, W.K.M. (2015). An extension of the MULTIMOORA method for solving complex decision-making problems based on the use of interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers. Transformations in Business and Economics, 14(2B), 355–375.
 
Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Karabasevic, D., Turskis, Z., Keršulienė, V. (2017). New group decision-making ARCAS approach based on the integration of the SWARA and the ARAS methods adapted for negotiations. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(4), 599–618. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1327455.
 
Sundmaeker, H., Verdouw, C., Wolfert, S., Freire, L.P. (2016). Internet of Food and Farm 2020. In: Digitising the Industry: Internet of Things Connecting the Physical, Digital and Virtual Worlds. River Publisher, pp. 129–151.
 
Turskis, Z., Lazauskas, M., Zavadskas, E.K. (2012). Fuzzy multiple criteria assessment of construction site alternatives for non-hazardous waste incineration plant in Vilnius city, applying ARAS-F and AHP methods. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 20(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2011.645827.
 
Turskis, Z., Dzitac, S., Stankiuvienė, A., Šukys, R. (2019a). A fuzzy group decision-making model for determining the most influential persons in the sustainable prevention of accidents in the construction SMEs. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, 14(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2019.1.3364.
 
Turskis, Z., Goranin, N., Nurusheva, A., Boranbayev, S. (2019b). Information security risk assessment in critical infrastructure: a hybrid MCDM approach. Informatica, 30(1), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2019.203.
 
Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E.K. (2010a). A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS-F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location. Transport, 25(4), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.52.
 
Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E.K. (2010b). A novel method for multiple criteria analysis: grey additive ratio assessment (ARAS-G) method. Informatica, 21(4), 597–610. Accession Number: WOS:000285982300008. https://www.mii.lt/Informatica/pdf/info711.pdf.
 
Upadhyay, K., Yadav, A.K., Gandhi, P. (2019). A review of internet of things from Indian perspective. In: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 478, 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1642-5_55.
 
Veisi, H., Liaghati, H., Alipour, A. (2016). Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Ecological Indicators, 60, 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.012.
 
Velten, S., Leventon, J., Jager, N., Newig, J. (2015). What is sustainable agriculture? A systematic review. Sustainability, 7(6), 7833–7865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067833.
 
Verdouw, C., Wolfert, J., Tekinerdogan, B. (2016). Internet of Things in agriculture. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 11 12 https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201611035.
 
Villa-Henriksen, A., Edwards, G.T.C., Pesonen, L.A., Green, O., Sørensen, C.A.G. (2020). Internet of things in arable farming: implementation, applications, challenges and potential. Biosystems Engineering, 191, 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.12.013.
 
Vinodh, S., Mulanjur, G., Thiagarajan, A. (2013). Sustainable concept selection using modified fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 6(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2012.682100.
 
Wang, B., Song, J., Ren, J., Li, K., Duan, H., Wang, X. (2019a). Selecting sustainable energy conversion technologies for agricultural residues: a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based prioritization from life cycle perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 142, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.011.
 
Wang, J., Cao, C., Zeng, S., Balezentis, T. (2019b). Weighted induced aggregation euclidean distance operators for the decision making of robot selection1. Transformations in Business and Economics, 18(1), 81–94.
 
Yazdani, M., Wen, Z., Liao, H., Banaitis, A., Turskis, Z. (2019a). A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(8), 858–874. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.11309.
 
Yao, J.S., Lin, F.T. (2002). Constructing a fuzzy flow-shop sequencing model based on statistical data. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 29(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-613X(01)00064-0.
 
Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2019b). A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458.
 
Ye, F. (2010). An extended TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for virtual enterprise partner selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), 7050–7055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.013.
 
Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
 
Zadeh, L. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249.
 
Zagorskas, J., Turskis, Z. (2020a). Location preferences of new pedestrian bridges based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and GIS-based estimation. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 15(2), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.478.
 
Zagorskas, J., Turskis, Z. (2020b). Setting priority list for construction works of bicycle path segments based on Eckenrode rating and ARAS-F decision support method integrated in GIS. Transport, 35(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2020.12478.
 
Zahm, F., Viaux, P., Vilain, L., Girardin, P., Mouchet, C. (2008). Assessing farm sustainability with the IDEA method – from the concept of agriculture sustainability to case studies on farms. Sustainable Development, 16(4), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.380.
 
Zarei, M., Mohammadian, A., Ghasemi, R. (2016). Internet of things in industries: a survey for sustainable development. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 10(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2016.079586.
 
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10.
 
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Volvačiovas, R., Kildiene, S. (2013). Multi-criteria assessment model of technologies. Studies in Informatics and Control, 22(4), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.24846/v22i4y201301.
 
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Stević, Ž., Mardani, A. (2020). Modelling procedure for the selection of steel pipes supplier by applying fuzzy AHP method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(2), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta2003034z.
 
Zeleny, M. (1973). Compromise programming. In: Cochrane, J.L., Zeleny, M. (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp. 262–301.
 
Zemlickienė, V., Turskis, Z. (2020). Evaluation of the expediency of technology commercialization: a case of information technology and biotechnology. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(1), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.11918.
 
Zeng, S., Peng, X., Baležentis, T., Streimikiene, D. (2019). Prioritization of low-carbon suppliers based on Pythagorean fuzzy group decision making with self-confidence level. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32(1), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1615971.

Biographies

Mohammadian Ayoub
https://orcid.org/
Mohamadian@ut.ac.ir

A. Mohammadian is a Dr. Assistant professor of information technology (IT) management at the University of Tehran. He earned his B.S. in Business Administration and his M.A. and PhD in IT management from the University of Tehran. In addition to teaching, he is the founder of a platform for university-industry collaborations. He was honoured with the award for his contributions to the national e-government project in Iran’s commerce ministry. He is the author of more than 40 scholarly articles in academic journals and conferences on digital business models, digital strategy and digital innovations. His recent research focuses on the internet of things business value and challenges.

Heidary Dahooie Jalil
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4037-6670
Heidaryd@ut.ac.ir

J. Heidary Dahooie is an associate professor at the Department of Industrial Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. He has received a BSc degree in Industrial Engineering from the Sharif University of Technology and MSc and PhD degrees from the Department of Industrial Engineering of the Amirkabir University of Technology. His research and teaching interests include technology and knowledge management, multi-criteria decision-making, data mining and business process management. He has published articles in various indexed journals, including Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Journal of Knowledge Management, Expert Systems with Applications, Neural Computing & Applications, and International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

Qorbani Ali Reza
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-0590
qorbani@alumni.ut.ac.ir

A.R. Qorbani is an MSc graduate in IT management from the University of Tehran and received his bachelor’s degree in industrial management from the International University of Imam Khomeini. MSc. Student of Information Technology (IT) Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. He is currently working as a researcher in technology management, technology assessment, multi-criteria decision-making, fuzzy logic, literature review and text mining at the University of Tehran.

Zavadskas Edmundas Kazimieras
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-949X
edmundas.zavadskas@vilniustech.lt

E.K. Zavadskas, PhD, DSc, Dr. habil., Dr. H. C. multi, Prof. Chief researcher of Institute of Sustainable Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania. PhD in building structures (1973). Dr. Sc. (1987) in building technology and management. Dr. Habil (1993). Founder of Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (1990). A member of the Lithuanian Academy of Science; a member of several foreign Academies of Sciences; an Honorary doctor from Poznan, Saint-Petersburg, and Kyiv universities. A member of international organizations; a member of steering and program committees at many international conferences; chairman of EURO Working Group ORSDCE; associate editor, guest editor, or editorial board member for 40 international journals (Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Automation in Construction, Informatica, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, Symmetry, Sustainability, Applied Intelligence, Energy, Entropy and other); the author and co-author of more than 600 papers and many monographs in Lithuanian, English, German and Russian. Founding editor of journals Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, International Journal of Strategic Property Management. He was a highly cited researcher in 2014, 2018, 2019, and 2020. Research interests: multi-criteria decision-making, civil engineering, sustainable development, fuzzy multi-criteria decision making.

Turskis Zenonas
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5835-9388
zenonas.turskis@vilniustech.lt

Z. Turskis is prof. Dr. of technical sciences, professor at the Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, a chief research fellow at the Laboratory of Operational Research, director of Research Institute of Sustainable Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania. Research interests: construction technology and management, decision-making theory, computer-aided automation in design, and expert systems. He is the author of more than 165 research papers referred to in the Web of Science database. He was a highly cited researcher in 2019 and 2020.


Full article Related articles Cited by PDF XML
Full article Related articles Cited by PDF XML

Copyright
© 2021 Vilnius University
by logo by logo
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
Internet of Things sustainable development IoT challenges MCDM IVTFN SWARA IVTFN ARAS

Metrics
since January 2020
2010

Article info
views

903

Full article
views

920

PDF
downloads

171

XML
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

INFORMATICA

  • Online ISSN: 1822-8844
  • Print ISSN: 0868-4952
  • Copyright © 2023 Vilnius University

About

  • About journal

For contributors

  • OA Policy
  • Submit your article
  • Instructions for Referees
    •  

    •  

Contact us

  • Institute of Data Science and Digital Technologies
  • Vilnius University

    Akademijos St. 4

    08412 Vilnius, Lithuania

    Phone: (+370 5) 2109 338

    E-mail: informatica@mii.vu.lt

    https://informatica.vu.lt/journal/INFORMATICA
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy